DR. CONRAD MURRAY MIGHT HAVE KILLED MICHAEL JACKSON

At the time of Michael Jackson's death, Thursday, June 25, 2009, Dr. Conrad Murray, his personal physician was with him and the last person who called 911 when Michael was no longer breathing however, failed to disclose his name during his call.

As a Doctor of Medicine by profession and a long time personal physician of Michael, he definitely knows the health status of his patient whether seriously ill or not;  if his patient could take prolong medication and prescription of prohibited drugs. A physician of good standing would always and by all means let his patient survive from a horrible disease. 

The tracked prescriptions of continuous medication of prohibited drugs to Michael were proven to have been a practice of Michael's doctors which was also happened  to Nicole Smith's case.

During Michael's death, law enforcers and investigators found serious sedative in his rented mansion in Los Angeles, California. The powerful sedative "Propofol" also known as Diprivan" was among the several narcotics taken by Michael which sedative is strictly prohibited for home use and only Anesthesiologists are allowed to possess. Diprivan is another kind of anesthesia that when dispensed to any person without an Anesthesiologist it would tantamount to cardiac arrest. The 50-year old Jackson had been consuming painkillers, sedatives and antidepressants which was the caused of his untimely death.

The Federal Drug Enforcement Administration and California Attorney General Gerry Brown together with the Los Angeles Police are working hand-in-hand to possibly involve and hold responsible those who prescribed and dispensed these narcotics and sedatives to Michael by dispensing it under various names of patient and doctors and by also using with different aliases in order to obtain the drugs.

So sad to realize that fame is always entangled with its surrounding greedy opportune with personal interests to enrich themselves.

BASIC ROLES OF HUSBAND AND WIFE

The increasing complexities in highly modern world affect severally the ideal marital relationship among couples. Marriages failed. It is rare nowadays that marriage works at the couple's lifetime. Since we do not actually appreciate unsuccessful marriage but it happened and ends the marital bond.

Unsuccessful marriage mostly happened in Western countries because of liberalism. Not only that, divorce is applicable to their laws.  While in conservative society, marriage is lifetime bond and commitment.

While it is true that complexities of the modern world affect marital relationship, let the influence be apart from it. Let the marital bond prevails exercising fully its marital obligations.

There are times husband and wife failed to exercise their marital obligations but do not allow marital conflict rule over it.

 

If we could find ways to resolve marital issues, then, why not, so that harmony exist.

The basic role of a husband is a good provider, a good father and a good husband. While the wife's role is to take care of the household, the children and her husband. All of these responsibilities shall be faithfully exercised. In the presence of economy recession, the couple has to work together to let the family survives.

Property relations between husband and wife sometimes the source of marital conflict. There are countries that when it comes to conjugal properties, the husband and the wife observed Exclusive Separation of Property or Complete Separation of Property. The husband owned exclusively his properties including earnings without giving a share to his wife, the same situation also with the wife, especially when the wife has her own property or earning.

Situation like this deprived the rights of the wife when the wife has no income being dependent to her husband. This is one of the reason why the wife has to leave their home in order to earn for a living. This is not supposed to happen because the wife should not be exposed from hazards and bad influences.

For countries whose law is Absolute Community of Property,  this law is  just fair because both of them enjoy its benefits.